| From: | rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Date: | 2009-01-30 18:35:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20090130103515.28d3b3ea.Rhubbell@iHubbell.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Nope, had to find it in another package called libpq-dev.
That's on UbuntuHardy. Maybe it's a maintainer problem?
What logic would lead someone to separate pg_config from everything else?
Do people often just install the server and nothing else? Then what?
You've got a server can you have a working db without any dev tools?
Maybe it's typical to install dev tools off-server?
BTW I ran into the need for pg_config upon installing DBD::Pg.
Maybe DBD::Pg maintainer problem?
Still a "Pet Peeve". (^:
I guess I don't care who owns the pet.
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:19:47 +0000
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:10 PM, rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)ihubbell(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Another "Pet Peeve":
> >
> > Where oh where is pg_config? Oh where oh where can it be?
>
> $PGDIR/bin ?
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Ribe | 2009-01-30 18:39:51 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Previous Message | rhubbell | 2009-01-30 18:09:42 | Re: Pet Peeves? |