| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning |
| Date: | 2009-01-27 20:32:48 |
| Message-ID: | 200901272232.50676.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:36:50 Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> > As one of the earlier reviewers, I think the design is OK, but the way
> > the implementation is presented was not acceptable, and very little has
> > been accomplished in terms of reacting to our comments. For example,
> > where is the SQL row security feature, which should have been designed,
> > implemented, and committed separately, in the opinion of most
> > commentaries.
>
> Eh? Are you thinking of column-level privileges, which was committed
> last week?
No.
> The SQL spec doesn't define row-level security, and coming
> up with something willy-nilly on our own doesn't really strike me as the
> best approach.
Exactly. But there is plenty of discussion on that elsewhere.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Brindle | 2009-01-27 20:34:17 | Re: 8.4 release planning |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-27 20:32:36 | Re: 8.4 release planning |