| From: | Rick Vernam <rickv(at)hobi(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning |
| Date: | 2009-01-26 22:03:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200901261603.16415.rickv@hobi.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 26 January 2009 2:12:02 pm Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > So, some feedback to make this decision more difficult:
> >
> > Users: care about HS more than anything else in the world.
>
> I don't think this is correct. There are certainly a lot of users who
> would like an in-core replication solution, but HS by itself is not that
> --- you also need (near) real-time log shipping, which we have already
> decided to punt to 8.5.
Precisely. Thank you.
> That being the case, I think the argument that HS is a must-have feature for
8.4 is actually rather weak.
I am just one person, representing one company...but I do agree, fwiw.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-01-26 22:06:34 | Re: 8SEPostgres WAS: .4 release planning |
| Previous Message | Chad Sellers | 2009-01-26 22:01:24 | Re: 8.4 release planning |