david(at)gardnerit(dot)net writes:
> Was reading the docs and stumbled across what I believe is a mistake.
> There is a mistake in Table 9-25
> the result of to_char(148.5,'999D999') should be ' 148.500',
> the docs list it as ' 148,500'
The example in the docs presumes a locale where comma is the radix point
(eg, fr_FR). Perhaps that should be clarified, but changing the example
so that D appears to act the same as . doesn't seem to me to be an
improvement.
regards, tom lane