Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "Rady, Doug" <radydoug(at)amazon(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Date: 2018-04-06 21:49:19
Message-ID: 20087.1523051359@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I'm still not particularly happy with this.

I'm a bit confused as to what the point is. It seems unlikely that one
pgbench process can effectively drive enough backends for select's
limitations to really be an issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-04-06 21:54:01 Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2018-04-06 21:48:58 Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks