| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Milligan <milli(at)acmeps(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PG 8.3.3 - ERROR: lock AccessShareLock on object 16385/16467/0 is already held |
| Date: | 2008-12-29 15:16:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20081229151624.GH4545@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> 2008-09-15 21:56 tgl
>
> * src/include/storage/: lock.h (REL8_1_STABLE), lock.h
> (REL8_3_STABLE), lock.h (REL8_0_STABLE), lock.h (REL8_2_STABLE),
> lock.h: Widen the nLocks counts in local lock tables from int to
> int64.
Doh, I didn't see it because I only checked the change log for lock.c,
not lock.h :-(
> > A customer of ours started hitting this bug too, last week.
>
> Tut tut, customer not on latest point release?
Wouldn't be a first for them (we try hard, they don't necessarily heed
advice).
Thanks!
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2008-12-29 22:07:25 | ALTER TABLE DISABLE RULE does not work inside of a transaction |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-29 15:06:18 | Re: PG 8.3.3 - ERROR: lock AccessShareLock on object 16385/16467/0 is already held |