Re: So, why shouldn't SET CONSTRAINTS set a transaction snapshot?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, why shouldn't SET CONSTRAINTS set a transaction snapshot?
Date: 2008-12-14 20:32:19
Message-ID: 20081214203219.GB6410@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> I don't like it just because it's another kludge in the way we set up
> ActiveSnapshot. I think it would be better if we were simplifying that
> code, not adding more kludges.

I just saw your commits. It's nice that adding this kludge helped
remove a previous one :-)

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2008-12-14 20:44:59 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-14 20:21:31 Re: So, why shouldn't SET CONSTRAINTS set a transaction snapshot?