Re: portability of "designated initializers"

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: portability of "designated initializers"
Date: 2008-12-05 13:19:55
Message-ID: 20081205131955.GC3755@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
>
> > I've already modified your patch a bit ... please send your updated
> > patch so I can merge it into mine. However, my changes were also
> > relatively minor. Since Tom wants it to be entirely rewritten then
> > maybe merging minor fixes to it is a waste of time ...
> >
> Since Alvaro is involved in finishing another patches, I improved the first
> patch based on discussion. What did I do?

Thanks. Sorry for being unable to work on this.

> (iv) change the *_base_thresh names to *_threshold. I know the names are not
> appropriated but postgresql.conf use similar ones;

Oh, please spell the names in full (e.g. vac_threshold to
vacuum_threshold; anl -> analyze, etc).

I'll try to have a quick look at this version today.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-12-05 14:05:31 Re: [postgis-devel] CLUSTER in 8.3 on GIST indexes break
Previous Message tmp 2008-12-05 13:08:59 Re: Optimizing DISTINCT with LIMIT