| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | William Temperley <willtemperley(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Very large tables |
| Date: | 2008-11-28 16:57:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20081128165736.GE8993@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
William Temperley escribió:
> Really I'm worried about reducing storage space and network overhead
> - therefore a nicely compressed chunk of binary would be perfect for
> the 500 values - wouldn't it?
An array that large would likely be compressed by Postgres internally
for storage; see
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/storage-toast.html
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2008-11-28 16:58:11 | Re: Very large tables |
| Previous Message | Scara Maccai | 2008-11-28 16:53:12 | Re: Very large tables |