From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrus <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee> |
Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds |
Date: | 2008-11-21 20:20:36 |
Message-ID: | 20081121202036.GK5210@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Andrus wrote:
>> So I gather you're not doing any vacuuming, eh?
>
> Log files for every day are full of garbage messages below.
> So I hope that vacuum is running well, isn't it ?
This does not really mean that autovacuum has done anything in the
databases. If the times are consistently separated by 1 min, then it's
possible that it always exits without doing anything.
In such old a release we didn't have any decent logging mechanism in
autovacuum :-( You can change log_min_messages to debug2 to see if it
actually does anything or not.
I suggest you connect to the problem database (and then to all others,
just to be sure) and run "vacuum" (no full).
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2008-11-21 20:48:21 | Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds |
Previous Message | Andrus | 2008-11-21 20:08:45 | Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds |