Re: TODO wiki display issue

Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Well, that's exactly my point. I showed Bruce the other version of the
> > page and he wasn't sure he could tell the difference, so I'm not sure
> > that keeping it is all that important :-)
> >
> > If people add new subsections and they don't notice that you need a
> > macro to fix the indentation, this clues that the indentation is not all
> > that useful.
> >
>
> Actually I would read that as a clue that sometimes people are inattentive. =)
>
> However, I do take your point. If we wanted to ditch the indentation,
> then some chunks of the template trickery involved in the Todo list
> could be done away with. I'm not necessarily opposed to the idea, but
> I'm reluctant to go to yet more effort to un-hack it.
>
> I'm also dreading the possibility that we go to the trouble to remove
> the indentation, and a few days later somebody posts on the lists
> saying "What happened to the indentation? The new version sucks!"
> etc.

I am hesistant to remove the indentation because then the only
observable difference between sections and subsections would be the line
under the heading section, which doesn't seems significant enough. I do
like the new layout myself.

Oh, one more thing --- in my browser, the subsections are bolder than
the main sections, and the same font size. Is this expected?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +