Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10
Date: 2008-11-06 16:04:20
Message-ID: 20081106160420.GG5520@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escribió:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > OK, I have got to the bottom of this. It appears that the Fedora people
> > have for some reason best known to themselves decided to stop bundling
> > the ExtUtils::Embed module with base perl, as it was before.
>
> That's been true since F-9, so I'm not quite sure why Pavel's build only
> broke at F-10. FWIW the postgresql Fedora RPMs have
>
> BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) glibc-devel bison flex autoconf gawk
> BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Embed), perl-devel
>
> The extra Requires for MakeMaker has been there even longer.

Huh, but the requirement for ExtUtils::Embed is at runtime, so shouldn't
it be a plain Requires instead of BuildRequires?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-06 16:09:23 Re: patch to fix client only builds
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-11-06 15:53:10 Re: RAM-only temporary tables