| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: specificity of claims |
| Date: | 2008-10-26 06:42:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20081026064255.GA23726@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:28:43PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:49:16 -0700
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Ron,
> >
> > > Shouldn't the project get a legal opinion on how to handle patent
> > > issues on the lists?
> >
> > You're right, we should publish this somewhere. If you believe that
> > you have knowledge of a specific, genuine infringement, then you
> > should send the information you have to pgsql-core (and not to a
> > public mailing list). Core will then seek legal help if it looks
> > like the risk is serious.
> >
> > Any idea where we could put that policy up that people would see it?
> >
>
> We can put it on the wiki and lock the page.
Developer FAQ?
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2008-10-26 06:44:42 | Re: specificity of claims |
| Previous Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-10-26 05:28:43 | Re: specificity of claims |