From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: specificity of claims |
Date: | 2008-10-26 05:28:43 |
Message-ID: | 20081025222843.425ad84c@jd-laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:49:16 -0700
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Ron,
>
> > Shouldn't the project get a legal opinion on how to handle patent
> > issues on the lists?
>
> You're right, we should publish this somewhere. If you believe that
> you have knowledge of a specific, genuine infringement, then you
> should send the information you have to pgsql-core (and not to a
> public mailing list). Core will then seek legal help if it looks
> like the risk is serious.
>
> Any idea where we could put that policy up that people would see it?
>
We can put it on the wiki and lock the page.
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-10-26 06:42:55 | Re: specificity of claims |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-10-26 03:49:16 | Re: specificity of claims |