From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: EXPLAIN CREATE TABLE AS |
Date: | 2008-10-23 13:37:45 |
Message-ID: | 200810231537.48574.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > It turns out you cannot EXPLAIN on CREATE TABLE AS, but it seems to work
> > fine if I extend the grammar as below:
>
> This seems to me to be something that will look like a wart, not a
> feature, from the user's point of view. You can't explain CREATE TABLE,
> but you can explain CREATE TABLE AS? It's just weird. It feels to me
> like exposing an implementation artifact.
As a user, I'm disagreeing about the weirdness of it. +1 for Peter's
initiative.
Regards,
--
dim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-10-23 13:40:54 | Re: EXPLAIN CREATE TABLE AS |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-10-23 13:31:48 | Re: pg_hba options parsing |