Re: Block-level CRC checks

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date: 2008-10-17 15:26:11
Message-ID: 20081017152611.GH4218@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

So this discussion died with no solution arising to the
hint-bit-setting-invalidates-the-CRC problem.

Apparently the only solution in sight is to WAL-log hint bits. Simon
opines it would be horrible from a performance standpoint to WAL-log
every hint bit set, and I think we all agree with that. So we need to
find an alternative mechanism to WAL log hint bits.

I thought about causing a process that's about to write a page check a
flag that says "this page has been dirtied by someone who didn't bother
to generate WAL". If the flag is set, then the writer process is forced
to write a WAL record containing all hint bits in the page, and only
then it is allowed to write the page (and thus calculate the new CRC).

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-10-17 15:42:39 Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-10-17 15:00:02 Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED