Re: BUG #4465: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tony Marston <tony(at)marston-home(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, 'Peter Eisentraut' <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #4465: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard
Date: 2008-10-15 15:57:14
Message-ID: 20081015155714.GC18271@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 08:28:42PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tony Marston wrote:
> > I think your definition of "Feature T301 Functional Dependencies"
> > is extremely questionable. [et cetæra, ad nauseam]
>
> The issue is that Postgres is _more_ standards-compliant than MySQL,
> but Postgres is not 100% compliant either. Is any database system
> 100% compliant?

No.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rodriguez Fernando 2008-10-15 17:20:05 Re: Postgres database problem
Previous Message Julien Vadnais 2008-10-15 15:50:48 BUG #4481: Big text insert/update using functions failed