Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches
Date: 2008-10-15 13:55:54
Message-ID: 200810151355.m9FDts205038@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think we could use row-level access control to prevent people from
> > seeing databases they should not see in pg_database.
>
> The row-level database ACL which I submitted yesterdat does not allow
> to assign ACLs to tuples within system catalogs (like pg_database),
> because it is unclear who should be the owner of tuples.
>
> As I noted at the previous message, it considers the owner of the table
> as the owner of the tuples due to several reasons. However, some of system
> catalogs have its owner field like "pg_proc.proowner".
> This limitation is not a fundamental one, so we can remove it soon.
>
> But, who should be the owner of tuples within system catalogs which have
> some kind of "owner" field.

The Postgres super-user should be the owner of all system tables.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-10-15 14:01:02 Re: Problem to get the tuple of a table
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-10-15 13:51:37 Re: Cross-column statistics revisited