Re: The Axe list

From: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The Axe list
Date: 2008-10-11 04:47:46
Message-ID: 20081011044746.GE19474@tomas
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:09:51PM -0700, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> intagg: ... Has not been updated since 2001.

[...]

> I also like intagg, because it's kinda like a "hello world" for
> writing one kind of C extensions. I'm not saying it needs to
> stay in contrib. Perhaps it could live on as an example in the docs?

and Tom Lane said upthread

> I tend to agree that chkpass is of doubtful value, but I'm not so sure
> about intagg. As you said yourself, we haven't yet replaced its
> functionality with a generalized substitute. Also, it's the only
> example in the current codebase of a useful technique, ie, an aggregate
> function doing its own memory management.

So it seems that intagg should rather live in a section "examples" than
in contrib?

(this seems to stem from the promotion of contrib from "just a bunch of
stuff which might be useful" to "useful modules you can use as-is to
extend PostgreSQL, no?)

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFI8C/yBcgs9XrR2kYRAr3WAJ0dDY6yVIqTitmjVB2bfih5K3/rzwCfd7wk
7hvtw/pHPyfbEUgGvFT87QQ=
=iofV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2008-10-11 06:29:25 Re: patch: array_ndims
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2008-10-11 04:09:51 Re: The Axe list