Re: Trigger disable for table

From: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trigger disable for table
Date: 2008-10-02 10:59:45
Message-ID: 20081002105945.GF20230@a-kretschmer.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

am Thu, dem 02.10.2008, um 12:26:20 +0200 mailte Frank Durstewitz folgendes:
> My idea is to have it like
> ...
> IF NEW.published = TRUE THEN
> ALTER TABLE a DISABLE TRIGGER mytrigger USER;
> (do update here)
> ALTER TABLE a ENABLE TRIGGER mytrigger USER;
> ...
>
> Will a construct like this disable the trigger only inside the this
> function or is the trigger disabled outside (visiblility?) the function,
> too, which is unacceptable.

I think, you can do that, but an 'ALTER TABLE' produce a
AccessExclusiveLock on this table.

Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2008-10-02 11:49:06 Re: Transactions within a function body
Previous Message Terry Lee Tucker 2008-10-02 10:52:07 Re: Trigger disable for table