| From: | Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Transactions within a function body |
| Date: | 2008-10-01 16:16:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20081001161603.GA9479@tux |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Reg Me Please <regmeplease(at)gmail(dot)com> schrieb:
> Hi all.
>
> Is there a way to have (sub)transactions within a function body?
No.
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Glyn Astill | 2008-10-01 16:23:04 | WARNING: 25P01: there is no transaction in progress |
| Previous Message | Gauthier, Dave | 2008-10-01 16:04:14 | Re: pg_restore stalled ??? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2008-10-01 16:22:40 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
| Previous Message | Florian Weimer | 2008-10-01 16:12:05 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |