| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |
| Date: | 2008-09-24 20:48:10 |
| Message-ID: | 200809242048.m8OKmA613690@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> > The objection comes down to this: it's an extremely large, invasive,
> > and probably performance-losing patch, which apparently will be of use
> > to only a rather small set of people. It's not unreasonable to discuss
> > just how large that set might be while we debate whether to accept the
> > patch.
>
> Significant loss of performance for people who are not using the
> feature seems like it ought to be considered a non-starter. "Not
> using MAC" needs to be a fast-path.
Right now all of SE-PostgreSQL is a compile-time option so I assume the
slowdown is only for compile-enabled builds.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-09-24 21:02:35 | Re: Where to Host Project |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-24 20:36:41 | Re: FSM, now without WAL-logging |