Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep)
Date: 2008-09-24 21:26:44
Message-ID: 200809241426.45415.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> Does that mean that they have looked at this specific patch and
> concluded that it meets their requirements? Or just that SELinux
> is a checkbox item for them?

That it was a checkbox item for them, and it led to them evaluating
PostgreSQL when they otherwise wouldn't have. I don't know the current
status of that evaluation.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-24 21:44:19 Re: [PATCHES] Subtransaction commits and Hot Standby
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-09-24 21:12:55 Upgrading pgFoundry (Was: Where to Host Project)