| From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: parallel pg_restore |
| Date: | 2008-09-24 16:04:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20080924090429.4262bea4@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:52:52 +0100
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Just as an FYI, by far the number one bottle neck on the multiple
> > work restores I was doing was CPU. RAM and IO were never the
> > problem.
>
> It would be useful to see a full breakdown of those results.
Its in the archives. We had a ginormous discussion about it about 6
months back (-hackers).
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-09-24 16:16:33 | Re: parallel pg_restore |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-09-24 16:04:22 | Re: hash index improving v3 |