Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec
Date: 2008-09-23 01:51:16
Message-ID: 200809230151.m8N1pGV03156@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There is still some unfinished business if anyone wants to make it
> >> really exactly 100% spec compliant ...
>
> > I agree.
>
> I committed the patch as presented, and I think I might go take a quick

Tom, which Interval TODO items did you complete with this patch?

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Dates_and_Times

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2008-09-23 01:57:16 Re: hash index improving v3
Previous Message Joe Conway 2008-09-22 22:42:13 Re: [patch] fix dblink security hole