Re: PostgreSQL future ideas

From: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
Date: 2008-09-20 13:06:31
Message-ID: 20080920090631.04402263.darcy@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:47:10 +0300
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 16:37 -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > I don't think that we should rush into any one language without
> > checking the alternatives. Personally I think we should port everything
> > to Intercal.
>
> My choice would be whitespace , see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language)

Hey, we could write two modules into each file, one in Intercal and
another in Whitespace. :-)

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joris Dobbelsteen 2008-09-20 14:19:00 Re: Oracle and Postgresql
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2008-09-20 10:47:10 Re: PostgreSQL future ideas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-20 15:28:39 Re: Assert Levels
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2008-09-20 10:47:10 Re: PostgreSQL future ideas