From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
Date: | 2008-09-20 13:06:31 |
Message-ID: | 20080920090631.04402263.darcy@druid.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:47:10 +0300
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 16:37 -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > I don't think that we should rush into any one language without
> > checking the alternatives. Personally I think we should port everything
> > to Intercal.
>
> My choice would be whitespace , see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language)
Hey, we could write two modules into each file, one in Intercal and
another in Whitespace. :-)
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joris Dobbelsteen | 2008-09-20 14:19:00 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-09-20 10:47:10 | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-20 15:28:39 | Re: Assert Levels |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-09-20 10:47:10 | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |