| From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | "'Jonah H(dot) Harris'" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "'Dave Page'" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "'PGSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
| Date: | 2008-09-19 21:09:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20080919140942.7b435ef5@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:01:15 +0200
"Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> Unless I am very off. C++ is a natural choice when porting
> (upgrading) ANSI C application.
> As far as I know, most universities teach some sort of OO programming
> language like JAVA or C# to help students understand OO programming.
> I understand that C++ is less popular but JAVA/C# would be the wrong
> choice for this.
I think the better question about all of this is:
What is the problem we are trying to solve?
Providing solutions that are looking for problems doesn't help us.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2008-09-19 21:54:49 | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-09-19 21:05:46 | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-19 21:31:52 | Re: WIP patch: Collation support |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-09-19 21:05:46 | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |