Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby
Date: 2008-09-15 17:07:46
Message-ID: 200809151307.47035.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 12 September 2008 07:44:36 Csaba Nagy wrote:
> And then
> the actually interesting question: what will the slave do with views,
> rules, triggers ? I guess triggers are out of the question to be
> executed, what about rules ? Probably must be also ignored... user
> functions will probably get errors if they try to update something...
> Views should probably function correctly.
>

If we dont have rules, we dont get views, so those need to be. Really we
should allow anything that would work in the context of a read only
transaction. (ie. functions that dont change anything should be fine to call)

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message George McCollister 2008-09-15 17:30:16 EncodeDateTime performance
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-15 17:03:56 Re: rmgr hooks and contrib/rmgr_hook