Re: Effects of setting linux block device readahead size

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Effects of setting linux block device readahead size
Date: 2008-09-11 22:41:55
Message-ID: 200809111541.55525@hal.medialogik.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thursday 11 September 2008, david(at)lang(dot)hm wrote:
> while I agree with you in theory, in practice I've seen multiple
> partitions cause far more problems than they have prevented (due to the
> partitions ending up not being large enough and having to be resized
> after they fill up, etc) so I tend to go in the direction of a few large
> partitions.

I used to feel this way until LVM became usable. LVM plus online resizable
filesystems really makes multiple partitions manageable.

--
Alan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2008-09-11 22:48:54 Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result?
Previous Message david 2008-09-11 22:33:53 Re: Effects of setting linux block device readahead size