Re: Noisy CVS updates

From: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Noisy CVS updates
Date: 2008-09-07 12:44:51
Message-ID: 20080907084451.dace9e3e.darcy@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:39:39 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> > ...etc. Would it be OK if I went in and added .cvsignore files to keep
> > the noise level down?
>
> Uh, no, at least not before you've explained why you get those messages
> and others don't.

I didn't know that I am the only one. Am I?

> (Personally, I never do "cvs update" without "make distclean" first;
> there are too many other ways to get screwed by updating a live build
> tree.)

I assume that you are talking about conflicts. In fact, that's one of
the main reasons for wanting a quiet update so that I can catch those
right away when I am working on some files. I do an automatic update
daily to keep current with the head. I don't do a "make distclean"
first because I may be working on something and I want to keep the
changes in the tree to try stuff and report patches against HEAD.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-09-07 13:09:25 Re: reducing statistics write overhead
Previous Message Dmitry Koterov 2008-09-07 12:24:40 Re: Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg