Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code

From: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>
Cc: Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date: 2008-09-03 22:43:36
Message-ID: 20080903154336.1f0ea40c@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:26:44 +0300
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> wrote:

> So Andrews opinion was that Mb (meaning Mbit) is different from MB
> (for megabyte) and that if someone thinks that we define shared
> buffers in megabits can get confused and order wrong kind of network
> card ?

I was actually referring to:


Joshua D. Drake

The PostgreSQL Company since 1997:
PostgreSQL Community Conference:
United States PostgreSQL Association:
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-03 22:57:57 Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-03 22:36:44 Re: [PATCH] In case module has wrong magic, report exact problem