| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: proposal sql: labeled function params |
| Date: | 2008-08-24 18:32:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20080824183236.GB30960@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:00:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> So I feel that the proposal for labeled parameters as such is dead
> in the water, and that the only usefulness this thread has had is
> (re-) exploring the syntactic alternatives available for named params.
FWIW, I think the way that python manages named and labelled params in
a single calling syntax fairly straightforward.
http://docs.python.org/tut/node6.html#SECTION006720000000000000000
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2008-08-24 18:33:34 | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-08-24 17:43:23 | Re: proposal sql: labeled function params |