Re: CREATE CAST too strict?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: CREATE CAST too strict?
Date: 2008-08-23 12:37:08
Message-ID: 200808231537.08910.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 22 August 2008 22:25:08 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter, have you completed this yet?

yes

>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
> > > I propose that we relax these two checks to test for
> > > binary-coercibility instead, which is effectively what is expected and
> > > required here anyway.
> >
> > Here is the corresponding patch.
>
> [ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-08-23 12:38:50 Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-08-23 12:35:34 Re: proposal sql: labeled function params