Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Date: 2008-08-20 13:54:38
Message-ID: 20080820135438.GE4169@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Asko Oja escribió:

> In the first message Martin asked
> "There are probably a lot of details that I have overlooked. I'd be really
> thankful for some constructive comments and criticism. Especially, what
> needs
> to be done to have this in the core. Feedback appreciated."
>
> Can we get back to the topic?

This is where the interesting questions are:

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/10333.1219179364%40sss.pgh.pa.us

I think the efforts to get the patch in 8.3 are wasted time. Better
concentrate on getting something good for everyone in 8.4.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Asko Oja 2008-08-20 14:03:19 Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-08-20 13:39:47 Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf