| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Michael Nacos" <m(dot)nacos(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
| Date: | 2008-08-19 09:25:21 |
| Message-ID: | 200808191225.23039.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Monday, 18. August 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> The impression I get every time this comes up is that various people
> have different problems they want to solve that (they think) require
> redesign of the way GUC works. Those complicated solutions arise from
> attempting to satisfy N different demands simultaneously.
Which may be the reason that I have been getting the impression that
the "Problems" and the proposed resolutions on
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/GUCS_Overhaul are not really closely related.
I can agree with the Problems, but then I am lost.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Xiao Meng | 2008-08-19 09:28:38 | Re: hash index improving v3 |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-08-19 09:24:24 | Re: possible minor EXPLAIN bug? |