Re: So what about XSLT?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: So what about XSLT?
Date: 2008-08-18 12:18:44
Message-ID: 200808181518.45384.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Friday, 15. August 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > well, contrib/xml2/xslt_proc.c has 172 lines. So I suggest we just
> > import that to core and drop the rest of the module as redundant.
>
> I assume that wouldn't provide the functionality Peter wants; else the
> above would have happened already in 8.3.

Well, another part of my hesitation was the question whether we want to deal
with yet another library. But since libxslt has since snuck into configure
and is well-established, most of that concern goes away.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2008-08-18 12:22:45 Re: any psql static binary for iphone ?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-08-18 12:11:09 Compatibility types, type aliases, and distinct types