Re: [Q] DNS(bind) ER model

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Q] DNS(bind) ER model
Date: 2008-08-15 13:46:00
Message-ID: 20080815134600.GB82656@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:26:54AM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
> Have you looked at mydns? It is a database driven DNS server - and it
> works just fine with Postgresql.

Given that the references section of its documentation doesn't include
a number of important RFCs, are you quite sure it's really a complete
DNS server? (Note that I haven't tested it, so I'm asking in genuine
ignorance. But the lack of a reference to RFC 2671, which defines
EDNS0, sure doesn't give me warm fuzzies. If you're deploying a name
server today and it doesn't support EDNS0, it's possible you're going
to find that some users can't resolve your names in the near future.)

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Otto 2008-08-15 13:57:28 Re: Update taking forever
Previous Message Gauthier, Dave 2008-08-15 13:43:49 Killing active users