| From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alex Vinogradovs <AVinogradovs(at)Clearpathnet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: non-WAL btree? |
| Date: | 2008-08-01 20:16:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20080801131626.48095a12@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:07:18 -0700
Alex Vinogradovs <AVinogradovs(at)Clearpathnet(dot)com> wrote:
> By loading in bulks, I mean I load some 40-50 thousand
> rows at once into a table that already has some millions.
> Index rebuild on that table after each 50k inserts will
> be even less efficient ;)
Fair enough, to answer your question, "no". We don't have any non wal
table tables or index types.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Wilson | 2008-08-01 20:18:49 | Re: non-WAL btree? |
| Previous Message | David Wilson | 2008-08-01 20:16:19 | Re: non-WAL btree? |