Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723
Date: 2008-07-30 04:21:39
Message-ID: 20080730042139.GD6750@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:49:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom> That whole business of using the EState to pass tuplestores back
> > Tom> and forth looks fundamentally broken to me anyway; there's just
> > Tom> no way it'll be certain to link the right nodes together in
> > Tom> complicated cases with multiple recursions.
>
> > Mutual recursion is not allowed;
>
> Well, the spec allows it, so we're going to have to fix this kluge
> sooner or later, even if it chances not to fail on the subset we
> currently support.

Any ideas how to approach this?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Lor 2008-07-30 04:34:54 Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03
Previous Message Robert Haas 2008-07-30 02:12:22 modifying views

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Zaun 2008-07-30 16:51:34 Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-07-29 14:27:23 Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode