Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-24 07:43:25
Message-ID: 200807241043.26371.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Wednesday, 23. July 2008 schrieb Marko Kreen:
> And the idea to turn pgfoundry into CPAN
> is pointless.  An user may willing to throw random modules to his
> random perl script, but not to his whole db architecture.

Based on what reasoning?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2008-07-24 07:44:04 Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-24 07:37:11 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance