Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date: 2008-07-23 20:44:30
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:

> I didn't get much further than that because I got discouraged after
> looking at the locking issues around the pending-insertions list.
> It's a mess:

These are rather severe problems. Maybe there's a better solution, but
perhaps it would be good enough to lock out concurrent access to the
index while the bulkinsert procedure is working.

Alvaro Herrera
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manoel Henrique 2008-07-23 20:47:22 Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2008-07-23 20:28:46 Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-07-23 21:01:18 Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-23 20:08:21 Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements