Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11
Date: 2008-07-21 22:13:59
Message-ID: 20080721221359.GI32548@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:41:55AM +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:

> I am aware of the heavy locking involved with Slony, which should mean that
> it blocks the application connections; that's be completely acceptable,
> given all the warnings in the Slony docs. But what I am concerned about and
> trying to hunt down is why <IDLE> backend processes are all consuming up all
> of CPU (!!!) so much so that I am unable to fire up any new process!

Ah, well, then, yes, the spinlock improvements probably will help
you. But you should disabuse yourself of the idea that <IDLE>
processes have no cost. You still have to talk to all those
connections when doing schema changes.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-07-21 22:15:53 Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-07-21 21:50:46 Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE