Re: Presenting groups

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 02:50:05PM +0200, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:
> I keep in mind that we are all volunteers here, and that we will help PG
> Eu projects as part-part-part-time occupations. The one giving some
> hours to PG Eu per week may be already an important contributor :-)

Remember the long tail :)

> I just proposed some kind of organisation and I appreciate your remarks,
> I wish many more answer too, has we have a consensus to start real things.

> I think cutting in small groups, with skilled persons for the domain is
> way better than having everyone trolling on everything on every single
> idea.

Absolutely, and if you have the names to go with each of the groups than i
am with you in that it is a good thing. My assumption was that you were starting
'from scratch' and making up the workgroups. Workgroups should not become an end
in themselves, but i expect you are fully aware of that :)

It is good to have names with tasks I think, if those people accept that they
are driving those efforts. Otherwise, you run the risk of getting a lot of 'yes
cool i can do this i can do that' without ever getting the output.

Gr,

Koen

- --
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Databases, wiki-expertise, hosting, server- en infrabeheer.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIf1IrktDgRrkFPpYRArn1AKCcxXh3SQBDJxXZbXLnyJy6Yd1ftgCeM4qN
fEcF5Z37W6yv/gYTLCKH8Kw=
=3Kh9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----