Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump lock timeout

From: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, hari(at)efrontier(dot)com, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump lock timeout
Date: 2008-07-16 12:37:36
Message-ID: 20080716123736.GJ11471@sonic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:55:01AM -0700, daveg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:15:10AM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > On 5/11/08, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> wrote:
> > > Attached is a patch to add a commandline option to pg_dump to limit how long
> > > pg_dump will wait for locks during startup.
> >
> > My quick review:
> >
> > - It does not seem important enough to waste a short option on.
> > Having only long option should be enough.
>
> Agreed. I'll change it.
>
> > - It would be more polite to do SET LOCAL instead SET.
> > (Eg. it makes safer to use pg_dump through pooler.)
>
> Also agreed. Thanks.

On second glance, pg_dump sets lots of variables without using SET LOCAL.
I think fixing that must be the subject of a separate patch as fixing just
one of many will only cause confusion.

> > - The statement_timeout is set back with "statement_timeout = default"
> > Maybe it would be better to do "= 0" here? Although such decision
> > would go outside the scope of the patch, I see no sense having
> > any other statement_timeout for actual dumping.
>
> I'd prefer to leave whatever policy is otherwise in place alone. I can see
> use cases for either having or not having a timeout for pg_dump, but it does
> seem outside the scope of this patch.

As it happens, another patch has set the policy to "statement_timeout = 0",
so I will follow that.

I'm sending in the revised patch today.

-dg

--
David Gould daveg(at)sonic(dot)net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-16 14:54:38 autovacuum crash due to null pointer
Previous Message Xiao Meng 2008-07-16 10:29:28 Re: gsoc, store hash index tuple with hash code only

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-16 16:55:39 Is autovacuum doing a wraparound-avoiding VACUUM?
Previous Message David Fetter 2008-07-16 05:22:57 Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP