Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3
Date: 2008-07-09 21:01:03
Message-ID: 20080709210103.GM3946@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2008, at 13:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>> One thing that jumps at me is pgTAP usage, as Zdenek said. I
>> understand that it's neat and all that, but we can't include the
>> tests because they won't run unless one installs pgTAP which seems a
>> nonstarter. So if you want the tests in the repository along the
>> rest of the stuff, they really should use pg_regress.
>
> It does use pg_regress. The test just load the included pgtap.sql file
> to get the tap functions, and then away they go. If you run `make
> installcheck` it works.

Uh-huh, OK, that's fine then I guess.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2008-07-10 00:06:19 Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-07-09 20:50:44 Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3