| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | sftf <sftf-misc(at)mail(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Roles as objects in Postgres's security system |
| Date: | 2008-07-02 15:00:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20080702150012.GQ18252@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
sftf wrote:
> Hi!
> My English is bad, so in short - why Postgres (and surprisingly
> other's, like Oracle) lacks something like this:
If it's missing, it's because it's not implemented. This may be because
nobody has yet come to it, or because it has been decided that it will
not be implemented for whatever reason.
If the syntax you propose is part of the SQL standard, feel free to
propose it. If it's not, you need to present a solid case for it to be
implemented.
If you propose it and there are no objections, it doesn't mean it will
be implemented right away; it'll happen much sooner if you send a patch.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | paul socha | 2008-07-02 17:15:25 | Re: queries |
| Previous Message | kartik | 2008-07-02 14:59:02 | query |