Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL
Date: 2008-06-11 22:11:47
Message-ID: 20080611221147.GS5352@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

> After looking again, I think that this is not technically very
> difficult, but coming up with something that looks tasteful to everyone
> might be tricky. In particular I didn't see a nice way to do it without
> using struct ObjectAddress in a bunch of header files that don't
> currently include dependency.h. A possible response to that is to move
> ObjectAddress into postgres.h, but that seems a bit ugly too.

Ugh. I thought about having a new header, but that seems overkill.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2008-06-12 07:31:13 Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-06-11 22:07:45 Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL