Re: Overhauling GUCS

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: 2008-06-10 16:37:37
Message-ID: 200806100937.38124.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert,

> shared_buffers
> effective_cache_size
> default_stats_target
> work_mem
> maintainance_work_mem
> listen_address
> max_connections
> the fsm parameters
> checkpoint_segements
> random_page_cost

My list is very similar, execept that I drop random_page_cost and add
synchronous_commit, autovaccum (on or off) and offer 4 "packages" of log
settings.

So I think that we can get consensus on what are the "newbie" parameters
pretty easily.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2008-06-10 16:46:37 Re: Proposal: GiST constraints
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2008-06-10 16:33:41 Re: Overhauling GUCS