| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 20:10:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200805292210.13593.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> The big missing piece is lossless failover. People are currently
> doing it with DRBD, various clustering things, &c., and those are
> complicated to set up and maintain.
Well, we'll see at the end of this (we hope) how a setup procedure of DRBD vs.
PG warm standby works from a standing start. I wouldn't be overly
optimistic. ;-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-05-29 20:12:54 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-29 20:09:47 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-05-29 20:12:54 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-29 20:09:47 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |