Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: is copying planetpostgresql content

From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is copying planetpostgresql content
Date: 2008-05-27 16:29:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 27 May 2008 09:20:21 -0700 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 09:13 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > JD,
> > 
> > > They are in my neck of the woods, possibly a nice phone call would
> > > resolve the whole issue.
> > 
> > Sure.  I'm just not sure there *is* an issue.  
> > 
> Well there is an issue, it just may not be a problem :). It may just be
> one of clarification.


> > As far as I can tell, they are just re-broadcasting *publically available RSS 
> > feeds* (which is what RSS feeds are for, no?).  If there is any problem (and 
> > I'm not convinced there is) it's just that their copyright statement is 
> > unclear.
> Right.

I would not name it "re-broadcasting" because of all the work they have
done to integrate the content into the wiki but basically that's it.

So i'm also +1 for politely asking.

By the way: RSS feeds are for read, not for republish the content
without permission. I granted Devrim the right to publish parts of my
blog on planetpg, but i can't remember that i or most of the other
planet posters did include the permission for other usage.

Kind regards

				Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-05-27 16:35:41
Subject: Re: is copying planetpostgresql content
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-05-27 16:20:21
Subject: Re: is copying planetpostgresql content

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group